Let socialists rob from the rich 100% and you still won’t be able to pay the bills

“Tax the rich.” It’s one of the easiest political slogans in America.

Need more money for government programs? Tax the rich.

Want free college or groceries? Tax the rich.

Want universal health care, government-funded childcare, housing programs and expanded Social Security? Just make billionaires pay their “fair share.”

Elon Musk listens as President-elect Donald Trump addresses a House Republicans Conference meeting at the Hyatt Regency on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 13, 2024. Musk was the world’s first official trillionaire. (Getty Images)

There’s only one problem. The math.

THE MEDICARE FOR ALL TRADE-OFFS SOCIALISTS AREN’T TALKING ABOUT, ACCORDING TO EXPERTS

The Cato Institute recently decided to run the numbers on nine major proposals associated with the Democratic Socialists of America’s 2026 platform. Cato estimates those proposals could cost somewhere between $71 trillion and $212 trillion over the next decade.

Now, that’s a gigantic range and an important caveat to know. This isn’t a Congressional Budget Office score of one piece of legislation. Cato assembled estimates from multiple studies to illustrate the potential magnitude of these policies.

JONATHAN TURLEY: ABDUL EL-SAYED’S WEALTH-TAX FANTASY COULD WRECK THE MICHIGAN ECONOMY

But let’s take the low number. $71 trillion. Surely America’s billionaires can cover that, right?

Let’s find out.

AOC DOUBLES DOWN ON ‘MYTH’ OF EARNING A BILLION DOLLARS, CLAIMS FORTUNES ARE BUILT ON ‘ABUSE’

Take everything from the 400 richest Americans

Cato estimates America’s 400 richest people collectively held approximately $6.6 trillion in wealth in 2025. So, let’s do something even the most aggressive tax proposal doesn’t suggest.

Take it all. Not 40%. Not 70%.

100%.

Sell the yachts. Sell the stocks. Sell the businesses. Empty the bank accounts.

TOP SENATE DEM’S NEW TAX IDEA GETS TORCHED AS CRITICS WARN NEARLY EVERY AMERICAN COULD PAY

Congratulations. You raised $6.6 trillion. Unfortunately, you’ve covered only about 9% of Cato’s low-end estimate.

Want universal health care, government-funded childcare, housing programs and expanded Social Security? Just make billionaires pay their “fair share.”

And there’s another little problem. You can only confiscate someone’s fortune once. Next year, you need another taxpayer.

SEN TOM COTTON: DEMOCRATS SAY SOCIALISM WILL HELP. HISTORY SAYS IT WILL HURT

Take all the corporate profits, too

Fine. Let’s go after corporations. Cato estimates domestic corporations could generate approximately $35 trillion of after-federal-tax profits over the next decade. Let’s take every additional dollar of that, too.

Forget shareholders. Forget reinvestment. Forget dividends. Take everything. Including your jobs. Even then, according to Cato’s calculations, you’d cover only about half of its $71 trillion low-end estimate.

U.S. DEBT BLOWS PAST $40 TRILLION, JEOPARDIZING QUALITY OF LIFE FOR EVERY AMERICAN

And remember this. America already has bills.

The federal government is projected to run roughly $24 trillion in deficits over the coming decade under the baseline cited by Cato. We’re already spending money we don’t have before adding trillions in new promises.

Just raise the income-tax rate

Here’s where the math gets even more interesting. Cato cites Joint Committee on Taxation economists who studied how much additional revenue could be generated by pushing top federal income-tax rates toward their revenue-maximizing level.

Their conclusion? Surprisingly little.

Cato calculates the additional revenue at roughly $400 billion over 10 years. Why? Because taxpayers aren’t mannequins.

Change tax rates dramatically and people change behavior. They work differently, invest differently, realize income differently and find different legal ways to structure their finances.

That’s why you can’t simply take today’s income and multiply it by whatever tax rate sounds good on television.

Eventually, you run out of rich people

This is the part politicians don’t like discussing. You can argue America should have higher taxes. You can argue government should provide more services. Those are legitimate political debates.

New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, center, celebrates with Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., left, and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., during an election rally at Forest Hills Stadium on Oct. 26, 2025, in Queens, New York. (Andres Kudacki/Getty Images)

But let’s stop pretending there’s a magical vault somewhere containing enough billionaire money to pay for every promise Washington wants to make.

There isn’t.

Eventually the math works its way down the income ladder. First the billionaires. Then the millionaires. Then successful business owners. Then upper-middle-income families.

And eventually?

You. That’s right Uncle DSA Sam wants you.

And there’s another little problem. You can only confiscate someone’s fortune once. Next year, you need another taxpayer.

British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher famously said the problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Forty years later, we can debate the politics.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

But it’s getting awfully difficult to debate the math.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM TED JENKIN